Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Of Offences Affecting the Human Body

Chapter XVI of the penal code deals with the offences affecting the human body. This chapter describes which deaths are to be called murder and provides punishment for that. This chapter consists of 15(fifteen) sections.
The penal code, 1860 was the result of the then British parliament which was much different from the Act of England. As because then India was the colony of England, the British parliament under the supervision of lord.
Historical background of punishment of culpable Homicide:
Homicide means the killing of a human being by a human being. Homicide may be of two types.
a) Culpable homicide: which is a criminal offence and punishable under the Statutory  law of all countries under the penal code, 1860
b) lawful or simple homicide: which in not considered as an offence and which is not punishable under statutory law. In our country, such homicide are under also the penal code.
Culpable Homicide is such type of offence which has been considering as an offence from time immemorial. But the relief or punishments were not same at different times. Ratanlal and Dhirajlal discussed almost nothing about the punishment for murder1   before the arrival of the British.But there existed punishments provision for murder even before British.
Al-Biruni, and Islamist scholar wrote, “If the killer is a Brahmins and the killed is of another cast the punishment is “upobas’ prayer (yagga), and charity. Such type of murder is called “Bajra Brahma” But there are different provisions for other castes”2.
In Mughal period, there were also provision for murder. Death penalty,blood money were the punishment.
The penal code, 1860 was a new one to say the truth, the first compiled code passed by the British parliament after they took over the charge of the administration of Indian sub-continent.
The penal code. 1860, deals with the offences of culpable homicide  and the punishment for that chapter XVI consists of sections from 299 to 311.
Section-299, at first lays down that which deaths are to be considered as culpable homicide. The section state that, “Whoever causes death by doing an act with the intention of causing death, or with the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that he is likely by such act to cause death, commits the offence of culpable homicide.
This section has two elements to prove whether a murder is culpable or not. These are——
i.                   Causing death of a human being
ii.                 Such death must have been caused by doing an act
a)     With intention of causing death; or
b)    With the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death; or
c)     With the knowledge that the doer is likely by such act to cause death3
At first the matter is to be noticed that the offender has a bad intention to cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death.
When death is probable it is culpable homicide and when death is most probable it is murder. Mere killing of a person is not murder or culpable homicide, but it is so when caused with guilty intention.4 The offence of culpable homicide supposes an intention, or knowledge of likelihood of cussing death. In the absence of such intention or knowledge, the offence committed may be grievous hurt or simple heart. The intention of the murder is the most important to the charge of murder mere killing accidental killing is not culpable homicide.
Section 299 is introductory section of chapter 16  defines which murder or death is punishable.
Section 300 deals with murder. All the culpable homicide are not murder. That means it fixes which killing are to treated as murder. Murder is the most heinous crime of  world. There are five exceptions to this sections. These five types of killing though cause death are not treated as murder. An offence cannot amount to murder when it falls within the definition of culpable homicide; for this section merely points out the cases in which culpable homicide is murder. But an offence may not amount to culpable homicide without amounting to murder.
It does not follow that a case of culpable homicide is murder, because it does not fall within any of the exceptions to section 300. To render culpable homicide murder the case must within the provisions of clauses 1, 2, 3, 4 of sec -300 and must not fall within any one of the five exception attached thereto.
“Excepting the general exceptions attached to the definition of murder an act constituted culpable homicide amounting to murder If the criminal act is done with intention of causing death then it is murder. Clear and simple that if death is likely result of the injuries it is homicide not amounting to murder; and if death is the most likely result, then it is muder.5
Section 300 is more important than another section of the Penal Code,1860. This section should be read with section 34 and 35 and 38. It is of special consideration that, Where the act causing death directly is amounted as murder but the doer If has no intention or knowledge to cause death or such bodily injury may cause death can not be treated as murder under section 300.
The weapon used was a lethal one and the injury grave in nature was caused on the vital part of the body the act was done with the intention of causing death such bodily injury intended to be inflicted as was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. It falls clearly within the 1st, 2nd, & 3rd clauses of section 300 of penal code.6
Section 301 deals with the murder which was intended to cause to another’s death.
Section- 301 states, “If a person, by doing anything which he intends or knows to be likely to cause death, commits culpable homicide by causing the death of any person, whose death he neither intends not knows himself to be likely to cause, the culpable homicide committed by the offender is of the description of which it would have been if he had caused the death of the person whose death he intended or knew himself to be likely to cause.
According to section 300, The killer has the intention to cause death of a particular person but he causes death of another person; it is to be dealt under section 301.
If the accused commits an offence under section 301, the offence is regarded as an offence under section 300.
Blow aimed at the intended victim, if alights on another, offence is the same as it would have been if the blow had struck the intended victim,7.
The intention of the accused was to kidnap a girl. In doing so with weapon they killed another person. It was held that they were to be punished under section 302 and 149.8
Section 299, 300, 301 actually define what are culpable homicide. But there is no penal provision in these sections.
Section 302 provides the punishment for offences committed under sections 299, 300 and 301.
Section 302 states “Whoever commits murder shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for like, and shall also be liable to fine.
If the charge brought against the accused is proved without doubt, then and only then death penalty is to be awarded.
The charge brought under this section can be proved by—
a.   The death of the victim actually occured
b.   Such death was caused by the activities of the accused
c.   Such activities were conducted only to cause the death
d.   The accused used poison to cause death
The punishment of death is only to be awarded in the rarest cases. The court observed that the following principles should apply:
a.      Where the facts of the case disclose that the culpability of the accused has assumed extreme depravity; where the accused is found to be an ardent criminal and menace to the society; where the crime is committed in an organized manner and is gruesome, cold blooded heinous, atrocious and cruel, where innocent unarmed persons were attacked and murdered without any provocation and where the murder is committed by an accused who was in duty bound to protect the victim.
b.     The court shall consider both the aggravating as well as the mitigating circumstances in the case.
c.      Number of  ipso facto will not make a case. The rarest of the rare case but will be a relevant aggravating circumstances and the mental condition of the accused will be relevant mitigating circumstances.
section 302 states the punishment of committing murder.
According to section 302 whoever commits murder shall be punished with death or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.
If the charge brought against the accused in proved undoubtedly, then and only then punishment provided under section 302is to be awarded.
Distinction between culpable homicide and murder
Culpable homicide (s. 299)
Murder (s.300)
A person commits culpable homicide, if the act by which the death is cursed is done
Subject to certain exception, culpable homicide is murder, if the act by which death is caused is done
a. With the intention of causing death.
b. With the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death.
c. With the knowledge that the act is likely to cause death
1. With the intention of causing death.
2. With the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause the death of the person to whom the harm is caused.
3. With the intention of causing bodily injury to any per son and the bodily injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death:
4. With the knowledge that the act is so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death, or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death.
Punishment for murder by life-convict: 303. This section deals with punishment for murder by a life convict.
Ingredients of section 303:To prove  a conviction under section 303 of the Penal Code ,the following  ingredients must be needed;
a. Whether death was caused to any person;
b. whether that death was caused by the act of the accused;
c. Whether the accused did the act with the intention to cause death and
d. Whether the accused had been suffering the sentence for life while he committed the offence.
Punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder: 304. Section  304 of the Penal code deals with punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Section 304 provides that if any person commits culpable homicide not amounting to murder, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine,if the act by which the death is caused with intention of causing death ,or of causing bodily injury as is likely to cause death.
Ingredients of section 304: To secure a conviction under section 304 of the Penal  Code ,the following  ingredients must be needed;
a. Whether any person was killed.
b. whether that death was caused by the act of the accused
c. Whether the accused did the act with the intention to cause death or intended to cause hurt likely to cause death.
Causing  death by negligence: 304A. Whoever causes the death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to  five years, or with fine, or with both.
This section relates to cases where the homicide is caused negligence.it does not apply to cases where death has arisen, not from the negligent or rush mode of  doing the act, but from some result  supervening upon the act which could not have been anticipated. Under this section rush or negligent act must be the direct or proximate cause or death .
Ingredients of section 304 A: To secure a conviction under section 304A of the Penal  Code ,the following  ingredients must be needed;
a. Whether any person was killed.
b. whether that death was caused by the act of the accused
c. Whether the act of the accused was rush or full of negligence.
A driver of motor vehicle who is himself negligent can not be his defence, the negligence of pedestrian though is not unconscious and killed [Abdul Rashid Vs State, 9 DLR 207]

Causing death by rash driving or riding on a public way   304 B. Whoever causes the death of any person by rash or negligent driving of any vehicle or riding on any public way not amounting to culpable homicide shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
Ingredients of section 304 B: To secure a conviction under section 304B of the Penal  Code ,the following  ingredients must be needed;
a. Whether any person was killed.
b. whether that death was caused by the act of the accused
c. Whether that death was caused by rash driving or riding on a public way.
In Criminal law journal it is stated that “A is coming from a link road to a main road driving on a motor cycle ,the motor cycle colliding with the accused’s car which was laying main road .Car not colliding with motor  cycle ,Fact that accused was driving a car at a first speed could not make him liable for rashness and negligence if road was clear.
Duty of  a person coming deriving from a link road towards main road ,to see that main road was clear before entering same.
It was held doubtful ,if  death of deceased was due to any rash or negligence act of accused .Accused given benefit of doubt and acquitted.[1985-Crlj -2794]

Abetment of  suicide of child or  insane person 305. If any person under eighteen years of age, any insane person, any delirious person, any idiot, or any person in a state of intoxication commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide shall be punished with death or  imprisonment  for life, or imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Ingredients of section 305: To secure a conviction under section 305 of the Penal  Code ,the following  ingredients must be needed;
a.      Whether any person committed suicide
b.     Whether the person who committed suicide was under the age of eighteen years, or an insane or an idiot or a person in state of intoxication and
c.      Whether the accused abetted  him to commit suicide
Abetment of suicide  306. If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Ingredients of section 305: To secure a conviction under section 305 of the Penal  Code ,the following  ingredients must be needed;
a.      Whether any person committed suicide
b.     Whether the accused abetted  him to commit suicide
Attempt to murder:Section-307
This section deals with one of the major offences affecting to human body.
Simply this section states as follows:
‘A person when does any act with intention or knowledge an under such circumstances that if he by that act caused deaths would be guilty of murder and he shall be punished with imprisonment of either description upto 10 years, and fine shall also be given.’
Ø Further, if  he by that act caused hurt shall be liable to either life imprisonment or such punishment as aforesaid
Ø Attempt when done by person who is convicted of life imprisonment and hurt caused would be punished with death.
For the exhaustive understanding of this section we have to scrutinize the words used in the section, besides there are such other things to consider which are as follows:
Attempt and preparation:    
we have to be clear about what is attempt and what is preparation.
An attempt to commit a crime, is more than a mere preparation and must be move directly towards the commission of a crime.[ AIR 1961, Mad 498].
When the preparations are complete and the culprit commences to do something with the intention of committing the offence are said to attempt. [AIR 1961 SC 1698.]
Intention or knowledge:
          In the section there it is said that the doer must have intention or knowledge. That means either  intention or knowledge any one of the above two elements is necessary to prove him guilty. Further, such intention as refered in the section refer to the intention as said in sec: 300 of the penal code that is
1.     intention to cause death
2.      intention of casing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause death.[ 1978 Raj Cric 432.]
Under such circumstances:
The word under such circumstances indicates the requirement that the act to which the section applies must be capable of causing death.[ (1956) 9 SauLR 407].
Further the act which would amount to an attempts under this section must be one which is capable of causing death.
Causing injury : 
It is not necessary for the applicability of the section that any injury should have been caused to person whose murder is attempted [1979 CriLJ, 400 (BoM)]
If injuries are caused due to the act, the accused would be liable to enhanced punishment as mentioned in the section. [1969 ker LT 488.]
Attempt to commit culpable homicide: Sec-308 of the penal code, 1860 deals with the offence relating to attempt to commit culpable homicide. According to this section, whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge and under such circumstances that, if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine or with both; and if hurt is caused to any person by such act, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years or with fine or with both. So we find that, if any person attempts to commit culpable homicide not amounting to murder he/she will be punished with imprisonment up to seven years or fine or both; incase the person is hurt and in case of not being hurt while attempting to commit culpable homicide the punishment will be imprisonment up to three years or fine or both.
An example can be given thus:
A, on grave and sudden provocation, fires a pistol at z, under such circumstances that if he there by caused death he would be guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. A has committed the offence defined in this section. (Ratanlal and Dhirajlal)
Attempt to commit suicide: Sec-309 of the penal code, 1860 provides provisions for attempting to commit suicide. The section states that, whoever attempts to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such offence, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine or with both. Suicide is not a crime under the penal code, 1860 only attempt to commit suicide is punishable. The act done must be in the course of the attempt, otherwise no offence is committed. Where a woman with the intention of committing suicide by throwing herself in a well, actually ran towards it, when she was seized by a person, it was held that she changed her mind, and she was caught before she did anything might have been regarded as the commencement of the offence. Her act simply amounted to preparation. [Ramakka, (1884) 8 Mad 5]
Thug: Sec-310 and sec-311 of the penal code, 1860 deals with the offence of thug and its punishment. According to Sec-310 of the penal code, whoever at any time after the passing of this Act, shall have been habitually associated with any other or others for the purpose of committing robbery or child-stealing by means of or accompanied with murder and According to sec-311 of the code, whoever is a thug, shall be punished with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.


1.       The Indian penal code. Ratanlal & Dhirajlal 35 edition.
2.   Tahkik-E-Hind-wl-Biruni, Translated by muhmmad Jalal Uddin Biswas.
3.   The Indian penal code, Ratanlan Drajlalad, 55edition. page 451.
4.   State represented by the solicifor to the government of the peoples republic of Bangladesh Vs Ashraf Ai and others 46 DLR (AD) 245.
5.   State vs tayeb ali & others 1987 BLD (AD) 265, 40 DLR (AD) 6; BCR 1987 (AD) 312.
6.   Md. Abdul Masid Vs State 40 DLR (AD), 83.
7.   Viswanath pillai vs state of serals, 1994 cr LJ 1037
8.   22 DLR (SC) 127
9.   Ashok komar pandey vs state of Delhi 2002 crLj 1844. 


Submitted by:

Chandrima Gosh - 13209112
Fajlea Rabby - 13019020
Mohammad Ashikur Rahman 13089051
Shanta Rahman - 13219074
Swarochita Anubhab Drishty - 13219104
Abdur Rahman - 13109002

Offences Against The State

Introduction

This Chapter comprises of thirteen sections. Section 121,121A & 122 deal with preparation, conspiracy & waging of war against the Government of Bangladesh. Section 123 deals with abetment by criminal concealment of arms with intent to facilitate design to wage war. Section 124 deals with assault on President, Government etc with intent to compel or restrain the exercise of any lawful power. Section 124A deals with Sedition. Section 125 to 127 refer to hostile acts against any Asiatic Power in alliance with the Government of Bangladesh. And section 128 to 130 deal with public servant aiding escape of, rescuing or harbouring prisoner.

Waging War:
The words “wages war” occurring in section 121 of the Penal Code & the words “waged war” occurring in sub-clause(III) of Clause(b) of Article2 of President Order No 8 of 1972 mean waging war in the manner usual in a war.
The waging of war is the attempt to accomplish by violence, any purpose of a public nature when multitude rises and assembles to attain, by force and violence, any object of a general public nature. It amounts to waging war against the state. It is not the murder or the force, but the purpose & intention that constitute the offence and distinguish it from riot.

Waging War Against State:
This section(121) embraces every description of war, whether by insurrection or invasion. It punishes equally the waging of war against the Government of Bangladesh, or attempting to wage such war, or abetting the waging of such war. The offence of engagement in a conspiracy to wage war & that of abetting the waging of war against the Government under this section are offences under penal code only. And are not treason or misprison of treason.
There  must be some evidence to show that the accused took some steps to restrain by force of arms the lawful Government from reigning according to law.
(Majibur Rahman Rahman vs State 1983)
Page 02
Abetting the Waging of War:
Such abetment is made a special offence. It is not essential that as a result of the abetment the war should infact be result of the abetment the war should infact be waged. The main purpose of the instigation should be “the waging of war”. It should not be merely a remote & incidental purpose but the thing principally aimed at by instigation. There must be active suggestion or stimulation to the use of violence.

Conspiracy of Waging War:
Ingredients: The ingredients of the offences under section 121A are:-
(i)     Conspiring within or without Bangladesh to commit any of the offences punishable by section 121, viz the waging of war against the government of Bangladesh or attempt to wage such war or abetting the waging of such war.
(ii)  Conspiring to overawe the government.

Intention of Waging War:
This section(122) is intended to put down with a heavy hand any preparation to wage war against the Government of Bangladesh. The act made punishable by this section cannot be considered attempt they are in truth preparation made for committing the offence of waging war.
The section 123 reinteracts the principal enunciated in section 118, the only difference being that the penalty under it is more severe.
The ingredients of this section(123) are:-
(i)     There must be a conspiracy of war against the state of Bangladesh.
(ii)  The accused must have knowledge about the conspiracy.
(iii)                        The accused concealed the existence of a design to wage war against Bangladesh.
(iv) The concealment will facilitate the wage of war.


Page 03
The ingredients of section 124 are:-
a)      The accused must have intention of inducing or compelling to exercise or refrain from exercising any lawful power of the president or the Government.
b)      The accused by means of criminal force or the show of criminal force –
(i)     Assault
(ii)  Or wrongfully restrains
(iii)            Or attempts
(iv) Or overawes
(v)   Or attempts to overawes the President.

Sedition:
Sedition is nothing but defamation of the established government. To prove sedition there may be following essential ingredients:-
a)      Bringing or attempting to bring into hatred or contempt exciting or attempting to excite disaffection towards the Government of Bangladesh &
b)      Such act or attempt may be done by –
(i)     Words, either spoken or written
(ii)  Or sign
(iii)            Or visible representation

Cases Relating to Sedition:
Mumbai Terror Attack Case 2008
Facts: 10 pakistani men associated with the terror group “Lashkar-E-Tayyiba” stormed building in Mumbai, killing 164 people, 9 of the gunmen were killed during the attacks. 1 survived named Md.Ajmal Kasab. The lone surviving gunman was executed in India in November 2012.
The location targeted were:-
(i)     Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminals Railway Station

Page 04
(ii)  Leopold café
(iii)                        Tajmohal Palace & Tower Hotel
(iv) Oberoi Trident Hotel
(v)   Metro Cinema
(vi) Cama & Albless Hospital and Nariman House
The government used automatic weapon & grenades in the attacks which took place on 26th-29th November 2008.
Finally the last surviving man Kasab was convicted of murder, conspiracy & waging of war against India. Kasab was sentenced to death by hanging & Kasab’s death sentence is upheld by Mumbai High Court.
On july 29th 2011, Indian Supreme Court received an appeal challenging Md.Ajmal Kasab’s death sentence. But Indian Supreme Court upheld the death sentence. And finally Md.Ajmal Kasab the last surviving gunman was hanged at 7.30am in an Indian prison.

Red Fort Attack Case 2000
Three people including two Army personnel were killed in the December 22nd 2000 Red Fort attack.
Indian Supreme Court granted death sentence to the terrorist Md.Arif who was directly connected with this attack.
On August 10th 2001, the Supreme Court upheld Arif’s death sentence & dismissed his appeal challenging the capital punishment awarded to him by session court.

Waging War Against Asiatic Power:
Ingredients of the section 125 are:-
(i)     The accused who wages war against any government of Asiatic Power in alliance with Bangladesh.


Page 05
(ii)  The accused who wages war against any government of Asiatic Power at peace with Bangladesh.
(iii)                        Or attempt to wage such war
(iv) Or abets the waging of such war


Depredation:
Depredation is plunder and to be punishable under the section 126, it must be a raid by a band of men in a foreign territory for plunder. The object of the raid is not to wage war but only to plunder.
This section(126) deals with depredation on territories of power a peace with Government of Bangladesh. Offence under this section is not cognizable and not bailable.
The section 127 deals with receiving property taken by war or depredation depredation mentioned in section 125 & 126.
This section(127) applies to those persons who knowingly receive any property obtained by waging war with a power at peace with Government of Bangladesh or by committing depredation on its territories. The offence under this section is not cognizable and not bailable.
The section 128 & section 225A provide for the same kind of offence. In both sections the public servant who has the custody of the prisoner is punished if voluntarily allows such prisoner to escape. In this section the prisoner must be a state prisoner or a prisoner of war; under section 225A the prisoner may be an ordinary criminal. The offence under this section(128) is thus an aggravated one than from the offence under section 225A. The offence under this section is not cognizable and also not bailable.
State Prisoner: “State prisoner” is one whose confinement is necessary in order to preserve the security of Bangladesh from foreign hostility or from internal commotion and who has been confined by order of the Government of Bangladesh.


Page 06
The expression “State Prisoner” would seem to indicate a foreigner kept in confinement on political grounds or for political reasons and not in due course of law on conviction and sentence by a court of law for an offence against the law of the land.
(6 Beng. LR 456, 1870)
Prisoner of War: “Prisoner of war” is one who in war is taken in arms or who being in arms submit and surrender themselves are not to be slain but to be made prisoners. But it seems those only are prisoners of war who are taken in arms.

Aiding Escape of State Prisoner:
If any state prisoner or prisoner of war escapes from any place of confinement due to the negligence of a public servant in which case such prisoner is confined under the custody of that public servant, the public servant will be hled liable for such escape of the prisoner and will be punished under section 129.
A state prisoner or prisoner of war is said to escape from lawful custody if he goes beyond the limits within which he is allowed to be at large. Under section 130 a state prisoner or prisoner of war is permitted to be at large on his parole within certain limits in Bangladesh.
Moreover, the section lays down punishment for persons whoever knowingly aids or assists any state prisoner or prisoner of war in escaping from lawful custody or rescues or attempts to rescue any such prisoner or harbours or conceals any such prisoner who has escaped from lawful custody or offers or attempts to offer any resistance to the recapture of such prisoner.

Punishment for Waging War Against State:
Whoever wages war against Bangladesh or attempts to wage such war or abets the waging of such war shall be punished with death or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

 Book Reference
Ø  Ratan Lal & Dhiraj Lal
Ø  Johrul Haque
Ø  Dr. Jeaul Hasan
Ø  A.K.M Moniruzzaman

Submitted by:
§  Mahabul Islam - 13039086
§  Tania Sultana - 13219023
§  Laboni Dhar - 13219048
§  Sakib Hossain – 13059094
§  MD. Motiur Rahman - 13049038
§  Md. Habibullah Nixon- 13029012